Writing in his weblog about Corbyn and McDonnell’s servile dedication to expel any person whose remarks probably interpreted by way of Zionist mafioso as hateful or with no trouble upsetting to Jews, Atzmon concludes: “Corbyn’s Labour is now unequivocally a spineless membership of Sabbos Goyim [which I take to mean non-Jewish dogsbodies who do menial jobs that Jews are forbidden to do for religious reasons].
“The Labour party’s policies,” says Atzmon, “are now suitable with Jewish culture: illiberal to the core and involved specifically with the imaginary suffering of 1 individuals handiest. These persons are usually not the working category, they're mainly essentially the most privileged ethnic staff in Britain. Corbyn’s Labour is a Zionist Occupied Territory… It proves my theses that the Left is not a buddy to Palestine, the oppressed or the workless men and women.
“i'd have on no account believed that Jeremy Corbyn would engage in such colossally treacherous politics. I did not expect that Corbyn would turn out to be a Zionist lapdog. Corbyn was once a great hope to many of us. I suppose that the time has come to receive that The Left is a dead notion, it has nothing to offer.”
This creator too is greatly surprised after signing up a supporter (although no longer a member) of the Labour social gathering with the specific purpose of voting within the management election for that beacon of customary feel, that staunch champion of high beliefs, that first-rate white hope who would start a revolution in British politics and sweep away the crap and corruption left behind through Blair and Brown.
And the latest casualty on this ugly Zionist power-play is former mayor of London Ken Livingstone. In a heated public spat with one of the vital get together’s chief inquisitors, MP John Mann, he had the temerity to guard a feminine MP, Naz Shah, who had fallen foul of the occasion’s antisemitism police for comments made on facebook before becoming an MP. She had urged that Israel be transferred to the U.S.. She apologised profusely, however Labour’s Israel lobby went ballistic after raking up this historical comment. Had they forgotten that their hero, David Ben-Gurion himself, was once mad-keen on population transfer… of Palestinian Arabs, that's? So what’s to get occupied with? Mann occurs to be chair of the All-celebration Parliamentary team on Antisemitism. One-sidedness is the identify of his recreation.
What seems to have generated greatest sound and fury is that this statement by Livingstone: “When Hitler gained his election in 1932 his policy then was once that Jews should be moved to Israel. He was once helping Zionism before he went mad and ended up killing six million Jews.”
Joan Ryan MP, Chair of Labour pals of Israel, said: “To converse of Zionism – the correct of the Jewish people to self-selection – and Hitler within the identical sentence is fairly breathtaking. I'm appalled that Ken Livingstone has chosen to take action…. He must be suspended from the Labour occasion instantly.”
It scarcely desires announcing that Zionism may mean self-selection for the Jewish men and women nevertheless it has cruelly denied the Palestinians their right to self-selection for decades. However Livingstone is suspended from the occasion after 47 years.
President of the Board of Deputies of British Jews Jonathan Arkush will also be relied on to put in his two-pennyworth on these occasions, and he didn’t disappoint: “Ken Livingston’s comments had been abhorrent and past disgraceful. His state-of-the-art comments mix Holocaust revisionism with antisemitism denial, when the evidence is there for all to peer. He lacks any feel of decency. He need to now be expelled from the Labour social gathering.”
And on the suspension of Naz Shah, Arkush used to be in overdrive: “If the Labour occasion is to re-set up its credibility on this predicament, it needs to take four important steps forward:
“First, there must be a reputable inquiry into the whole Naz Shah episode. Secondly, the party has to take effective measures to eradicate antisemitism anywhere it happens inside its membership. Thirdly, the leader need to make it clear that allegations of antisemitism are not to be dismissed as arguments about Israel. Fourthly, Jeremy Corbyn have got to now respond to our repeated calls for him to accept that his meetings with rank antisemites earlier than he grew to be leader were not suitable and may not be repeated.”
Whether or not Livingstone’s declare that Hitler was once a Zionist is right, i know now not and care no longer. He possibly checked his details and used to be itching to score with this mischievous titbit. Whether that used to be a shrewd thing to do is a matter for idle chatter, not expulsion. In the meantime Zio hotheads inside and external the get together would do good to pay attention to the The Jewish Socialists’ group, which has some sound advice for them and sticks a pin in their now not-so-pretty balloon with this measured announcement:
“Antisemitism and anti-Zionism are not the same. Zionism is a political ideology which has always been contested within Jewish life since it emerged in 1897, and it is entirely legitimate for non-Jews as well as Jews to express opinions about it, whether positive or negative. Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews.
Criticism of Israeli government policy and Israeli state actions against the Palestinians is not antisemitism. Those who conflate criticism of Israeli policy with antisemitism, whether they are supporters or opponents of Israeli policy, are actually helping the antisemites. We reject any attempt, from whichever quarter, to place legitimate criticism of Israeli policy out of bounds.
Accusations of antisemitism are currently being weaponised to attack the Jeremy Corbyn-led Labour party with claims that Labour has a “problem” of antisemitism. This is despite Corbyn’s longstanding record of actively opposing fascism and all forms of racism, and being a firm a supporter of the rights of refugees and of human rights globally.
A very small number of such cases seem to be real instances of antisemitism. Others represent genuine criticism of Israeli policy and support for Palestinian rights, but expressed in clumsy and ambiguous language, which may unknowingly cross a line into antisemitism. Further cases are simply forthright expressions of support for Palestinian rights, which condemn Israeli government policy and aspects of Zionist ideology, and have nothing whatsoever to do with antisemitism.”
Briefly, the JSG says what desires to be mentioned and places the witchfinder-generals firmly of their location.
Of course if Labour – or the Conservatives – truly wished to be squeaky-smooth in matters of racism they would disband their Israel fan clubs (i.E. Associates of Israel) and droop all who refuse to condemn Israel’s brutal acts of ethnic cleaning and other conflict crimes. If men and women protecting public place of job put themselves equipped where they're influenced through a overseas military energy, they flagrantly breach the concepts of Public life. There are some distance too many Labour and Conservative MPs and MEPs who fall into that class.
The Labour get together introduced today it is on account that reviewing its ideas to ship a transparent message of zero-tolerance on antisemitism. For balance, why no longer in shape this with zero-tolerance of folks who use the occasion as a platform for promoting the crook Israeli regime and its continuing territorial ambitions? Go on, Labour, show Atzmon flawed… show the social gathering is just not Zionist occupied territory.
Related Video Links:
"The Controversial Truth" Project
G+ Business: https://plus.google.com/112373178590768262082
G+ Brand: https://plus.google.com/105978365750500458220
Please Follow Us on As many As possible to ensure we cannot be censored or shut down.
(LIKE, SHARE, COMMENT, SUPPORT US & FOLLOW)